Morality and its Origins

Understanding the dynamics of the subconscious mind enables the origin of morality to be discovered.

Changes in Terminology

Before proceeding on the analysis of this origin I need to make a distinction here. There are three ways to cultivate a set of standards that we use to shape and govern our path through life. To give a name to each of these ways, I use the terms "morality", "virtue", and "ethics". However, my use of these terms is different from their traditional usage.

I denote morality and virtues to be standards of behaviour that are adopted through learning by example (rather than by adopting standards through a process of intellectual analysis of the choices available).

This view of virtues means that they should be easy to apply. But it is not easy to explain what they are. In effect, virtues are based on feelings and so are non-linguistic. The person may ‘explain’ his approach to life by saying that he prefers to follow the dictates of his heart. This approach can be viewed as being similar to ‘situation ethics’, where the person’s response to any situation depends upon a spontaneous inclination.

I define morality.
Morality is a linguistic product made into a social practice.

A morality in any age is the sum of socially-accepted desires and values in that age. These values are a part of language; they can be articulated and so can be made the object of rational analysis. [¹]

Society creates Morality

Society is more than a collection of people ; it is a set of communal values and individual meanings. I consider values to be objective, and meanings to be subjective. I use this opposition of objectivity and subjectivity to denote the process whereby subjective criteria are created first within the imaginative person, and then become objective criteria once they are shared among the community. [²]

The set of communal values represents the contemporary state of morality, whilst the set of individual meanings represents the state of desired virtues. Language contains traditional values – this is what is implied in the ideas of social conditioning and socialisation. Language is the repository of values but not of meanings.

When any value is postulated to reside in language then its final activity is to become absorbed into morality (or possibly aesthetics). When meaning is postulated to lie outside of language then its terminus is virtue.

As an example, consider the 1960s in America and Britain. This period saw the flowering of the hippie generation. New virtues arose from the attempts to create a new non-materialistic consciousness. The initial inability to articulate the new feelings and attitudes led to a dependency on catch-phrases. Eventually, some virtues became articulated so they passed into the store of social values, whilst other virtues were abandoned.

As an example of how the inability to articulate feelings produces unforeseen effects, consider the illegal drug culture of modern times. It has left a residue of fear : such drugs are feared by the general population because their psychological effects still cannot be adequately articulated (this is due to current models of consciousness being inadequate).

The purpose of making this distinction between virtue and morality is to suggest how new standards, which first appear as subjective inclinations, pass into society as objective preferences. As society changes, new standards always arise first in individuals, and then, if needed, become absorbed into society as new social standards. In human evolution, new subjectivities always arise before new objectivities. Subjectivity always precedes objectivity.

Ethics is the stage beyond morality and virtue.
I consider ethics to be the way of adopting standards through a process of intellectual analysis of the choices available. When intellectual and critical thought (within the framework of psychological awareness) is applied to morality and virtue, so that they can be analysed and self-deception removed, then morality transforms into a social ethics and virtue becomes an ethics of individuality.

[ I show in another article (on Sexuality and Ethics) that ethics has a different origin from morality – ethics is generated as the sublimation of sexual anxiety].

Need and Morality

Now I consider the way that psychological need generates morality.
How does morality arise? Is it through the up-welling of noble feelings in a person or in society? No. Morality never arises in this way. Only virtues do. Consider social abreaction. This begins with a social catharsis and ends in social resentment, and sometimes in social bitterness too. What lasting imprint does it leave on society?

A major result of social abreaction is the desire for ‘The Fuhrer’, the strong leader, both in religion and in politics. [³]

Society convulsing in hatred or bitterness seeks strong right-wing leaders. Social abreaction leads to the need for some form of morality as a method of self-control, or as a method of controlling those people who have no self-control. I presume that all times of major social change involve an major intensity of social abreaction.

The need for right-wing leaders and for morality is the reason why a major religion like Christianity can only be born in a time of intense social change (all new-born religions are conservative). And why a religion can experience a major reformation only in troubled times. And why the Jews expected Jesus to be more of a political messiah than a spiritual one.

Morality is a right-wing response to social abreaction. Such a morality is a ‘resentment-based’ morality, as analysed by Nietzsche in his books ‘Beyond Good and Evil ’ and ‘On the Genealogy of Morals’.

In ancient times, when societies were small and probably stable, the paramount law might well have been ‘might is right ’, or the mores of the local patriarch. However, when societies start to change and become dis-orientated, morality is born.

I generalise Nietzsche’s views on Christianity. In troubled times when any society is being conquered or ruled by another society (or another segment of the same society), the underclass creates morality whilst the rulers reside in their virtues. And the morality created is always of the ‘resentment ’ variety.

Exception
Is there any exception to these views? The usual subconscious reaction to bitterness and resentment is the desire for revenge, and this is why morality born from this is always hard morality. The only genuine alternative is where the desire for peace is uppermost. This then gives rise to movements based on peace and non-violence, together with the cultivation of an inner religious sensibility (that is, to cultivate attunement to one's own inner self or soul, or to god ).

The number in brackets at the end of each reference takes you back to the paragraph that featured it. The addresses of my other websites are on the Links page.

[³]. A short analysis of abreaction is given in the article Emotion and Abreaction. For a detailed analysis of social abreaction, see the fourth article on Abreaction : Resentment and Bitterness, on my websites Discover Your Mind and The Strange World of Emotion. [3]

There are more ideas on morality and social change in the article Notes on Social Change, on my website The Strange World of Emotion. This presents the view that the motivating force of progressive social change is moral reform.

Nietzsche, F. Beyond Good and Evil. Vintage Books, USA. 1966. Translated by Walter Kaufmann.

---- On the Genealogy of Morals. Vintage Books, USA. 1969. Translated by Walter Kaufmann.

The copyright is mine and the articles are free to use. They can be reproduced anywhere, so long as the source is acknowledged.

Ian Heath
London, UK

www.modern-thinker.co.uk/

e-mail address:
ianheath9.mt<at>discover-your-mind.co.uk

If you want to contact me, use the address above but replace the <at> by @

It may be a few days before I can respond to correspondence.

.	What is the Origin of Morality ? We may speculate about origins, but all that this will reveal will be our hidden view of humanity. The ideas that we end up with will reflect whether we think of humanity as descended from noble savages, or from degenerate outcasts from Eden, or from anything else. Is there any way of approaching the puzzle that does not depend on imagination? Yes. We can resort to empiricism. We can analyse ourself and see and feel how morality is generated in ourself. When we analyse ourself, what we are primarily doing is analysing the subconscious mind to find out how it works and how it affects us.
Sub - Headings
Changes in Terminology
Society creates Morality
Need and Morality
References

A Modern Thinker	Philosophy of
	Psychology Science Metaphysics